Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Dino Prizmic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Lam Coleman Wong vs D. Prizmic
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
HKG
l
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
21
Age
20
-
Height
-
143
C. Rank
122
128
Best Rank
115
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$539.0K
Career Money
$308.7K
-
Plays
-
Dino Prizmic
CRO
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
21
Age
20
-
Height
-
143
C. Rank
122
128
Best Rank
115
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$539.0K
Career Money
$308.7K
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Wong 0 - 0 Prizmic
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wong | 0 |
| Prizmic | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
C. L. C. Wong vs D. Prizmic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $538,970 | Career Prize Money | $308,745 |
| 55.78% (164-130) | Career Total W/L | 65.97% (126-65) |
| 2 | Titles | 8 |
| 45.45% (5-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (4-4) |
C. L. C. Wong vs D. Prizmic Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 47.03% of points on their second serve, while Dino Prizmic has won 44.65%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chak Lam Coleman Wong, in recent form, has won 44.32% of their opponent's second serve points, while Dino Prizmic has won 46.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.73% and 24.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 51.60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dino Prizmic has saved 47.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 50.77% of matches played (W/L 33/32), with Dino Prizmic winning 70.91% (W/L 39/16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8). Dino Prizmic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 36/10), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 21/18), where as Dino Prizmic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 74.42% of matches (W/L 32/11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.98 while Dino Prizmic has played against players with an average rank of 259.69.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dino Prizmic has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 33.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dino Prizmic has converted 34.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Dino Prizmic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Wong 52%, Prizmic 52%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Wong 48%, Prizmic 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Wong 59%, Prizmic 62%.
C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025 | ||||
SF  James DuckworthJ. Duckworth | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF  Maxime JanvierM. Janvier | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2  Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1  Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo | W | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | ||
 Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025 | ||||
F  Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
D. Prizmic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNP Paribas Nordic Open - Stockholm - 13-10-2025 | ||||
Q1  Patrick ZahrajP. Zahraj | L | 1-6 3-2 ret. | ||
| Chengdu Open - Chengdu - 15-09-2025 | ||||
R2  Lorenzo MusettiL. Musetti | L | 7-5 3-6 6-2 | ||
R1 Terence AtmaneT. Atmane | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
 Davis Cup, World Group, Q2, CRO-FRA 1-3 - 08-09-2025 | ||||
Rubber 1 Corentin MoutetC. Moutet | L | 6-4 5-7 6-1 | ||
| U.S. Open - New York - 25-08-2025 | ||||
R1  Andrey RublevA. Rublev | L | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | ||
C. L. C. Wong vs D. Prizmic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.78% (164/130) | YTD Win/Loss | 65.97% (126/65) |
| 54.07% (372/316) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.56% (269/161) |
| 51.16% (3419/3264) | Games Win/Loss | 55.78% (2171/1721) |
| 58.90% (129/90) | Hard Win/Loss | 78.26% (36/10) |
| 46.51% (20/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.84% (59/32) |
| 50.00% (9/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.69% (30/22) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.52 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1687 | Aces Total | 586 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 603 | Total Double Faults | 506 |
| 1:31:40 | Average Match Time | 1:48:4 |
| 367.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 368.03 |
| 60% (11331/18739) | 1st Serve % | 60% (7429/12324) |
| 71% (8054/11331) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (5067/7429) |
| 49% (3631/7408) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2528/4895) |
| 41% (703/1718) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (662/1448) |
| 38% (7230/18830) | Return Points Win % | 43% (5365/12340) |
| 53.33% (8/7) | Slam W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 46.67% (7/8) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62.50% (5/3) | Cups W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 27.27% (3/8) | Main Tour W/L | 52.63% (10/9) |
| 55.65% (69/55) | Challenger W/L | 65.49% (74/39) |
| 59.50% (72/49) | Futures W/L | 79.07% (34/9) |
| 55% (157/286) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (121/183) |
| 83% (5/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 55% (56/102) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 35% (11/31) |
| 54% (51/94) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (29/49) |
| 87% (157/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (122/112) |
| 13% (157/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (122/9) |
| 20% (137/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (69/14) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sat, 22 Nov, 05:00 AM
Prediction
S. H. Choo7
T. Dean6W1
2.84
W2
1.36
Sat, 22 Nov, 06:30 AM
PredictionA. SantillanR. Sakamoto2W1
2.33
W2
1.52
Sat, 22 Nov, 05:00 AM
Prediction
K. Filar7
F. M. Rifqi5W1
1.74
W2
1.95
Sat, 22 Nov, 01:30 PM
Prediction
C. RobertsonJRT. SamuelW1
2.72
W2
1.39
Fri, 21 Nov, 09:05 PM
Prediction
T. Farjat6
J. V. S. D. LagoW1
1.163
W2
4.4
Fri, 21 Nov, 08:05 PM
Prediction
J. AlonsoqA. Mchugh4W1
6.45
W2
1.073
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025
20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Flavio Cobolli
Zizou Bergs20:00
H2H 1-1
James DuckworthJason Murray Kubler04:30
H2H 1-1
Maria Lourdes Carle
Mayar Sherif20:05
H2H 0-1
Ivan GakhovLorenzo Giustino19:20
H2H 0-0
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo20:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA-BEL
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia